Click on the images below to read.


TO THE RESIDENTS. PLEASE GIVE THE COMMITTEE YOUR OPINION ON THESE QUESTIONS
Q: HOW WILL YOU BE AFFECTED SHOULD THE PROPOSED MINING IN AND AROUND JERRY’S PLAINS PROCEED ?
Q: WHAT ARE YOUR CONCERNS IN RELATION TO MINING ?
Q: WHAT DO YOU SEE AS THE MAIN ENVIRONMENTAL AFFECTS AS A RESULT OF MINING ?
Send your answers to
savejerrysplains@gmail.com
Meeting with Management of Wambo Coal Mine 16/7/2008
Present: Steve Hedges, Sarah Bailey – Environment Manager, Scott Sullivan – General Manager
Committee: Louise Lannigan, Shirley Mitchell, Paul Nichols, Judy Hadley, Brian Atfield, Helen Holt
Topic of discussion – ELA 3465
The meeting was convened to enable further talks with Wambo Coal about their intent to explore and ultimately (with Government consent) mine in Jerrys Plains (JP) and surrounding area.
Contentious Issue
What defines Jerrys Plains?
Wambo Coal. The advertisement reprinted in the Singleton Argus / /08 states ‘adjacent to Jerrys Plains’ (south of JP). Wambo Coal representatives repeatedly assure the committee they will not drill/mine in the village!
Committee. The general consensus is the proposed area of exploration is blanketed by 60 & 80 km speed zones and therefore IS the village of JP, regardless of distance from JP Post Office. The hall is deemed the heart of JP village, it is the focal point for a majority of public events held in the village, and the village radiates from there.
The committee (as the representatives of JP residents) demand “an area of exclusion” be included in the future plans of Wambo Coal, however they will not come to the party at this stage as they are still in consultation with the Department of Planning re ELA 3465.
Other points of discussion
. Wambo Coal has no plans for the rest of A444 at this stage (they will let us know about that at
their leisure)
. Wambo Coal has not been in discussion with ResCo and has no relationship with them
. Scott Sullivan believes Wambo Coal would be the preferable company for ELA 3465
. Anything in mines’ proximity, in the mines’ view, is ‘acquirable’
. Wambo Coal will work with the JP community
. Will liaise in a systematic way
. Can’t make ‘problem’ go away, however can look at impacts
. Can’t guarantee JP won’t end up like Camberwell, as JP has 3 other mines in the area
. Existing plans for mining have restrictions on them already
. Peabody quotes their reserve holdings on their reports and have to show a certain level of
exploration
. When the amount of coal becomes ‘bankable’, it becomes part of reserves
. Peabody has reserves of 22 million tonnes in 10 mines across Australia. This is about 10% of
the total volume worldwide, and equates to 50% of Peabody earnings
. Australia is incredibly important to Peabody
. When Wambo has firm plans, they will return to the community with that information
. Will promote Community Support Engagement Strategy
. Looking to commence drilling in first quarter of 2009 (if awarded ELA)
Drilling
. Will clear a 20 x 20 metre area for the drilling rigs to set up
. Will drill a 6 – 8 inch (150mm – 200mm) to obtain soil/coal samples
. Do not have sites chosen yet
. Drilling will be spaced 1 km apart then 500metres apart if necessary
. Won’t cause damage to buildings
. Wambo will show residents of JP an actual drilling rig and set up. Will explain the process at a
future date.
Community concerns
. Wambos’ plans are causing angst in the community
. Properties on the market are not selling, partially due to mine influence
. Believe value of properties is influenced by vicinity of mines
. Need a buffer zone of area of exclusion so the village of JP is not seriously impacted by mining
. Believe the time frame for exploration and collation of results is too long
. JP is the oldest village in the area
. Have to keep our school open
. Only 3-4 JP residents work at Wambo, need more ‘locals’ to be employed by Wambo
. Need incentives for people to move to the area
. ELA causes concern and conflict
. ELA area covers JP future subdivision
SUMMARY OF JERRYS PLAINS MINEWATCH COMMITTEE MEETING WITH JOHN MAITLAND AT
JERRYS PLAINS HALL ON 23RD JULY 2008
Point 1 - The comments in no way reflect the individual or collective views of the committee.
Point 2 - The committee gave Mr. Maitland the opportunity to present his proposals for consideration by the community.
Point 3 - The matters raised were presented by Mr. Maitland and clarified by questions from the committee.
Point 4 - They are Mr. Maitland’s comments, not necessarily in the order that they were made, for the community to take in and comment on if they wish.
We encourage each and every one of you to respond to this website or by handing any other written comment to any member of the committee so your voice can be heard.
SUMMARY
Mr. Maitland is the Executive Director of Doyles Creek Mining Pty Limited (DCM). He has resigned his position as Chairman of ResCo Services. The Directors of DCM are Craig Ransley (ResCo), John Maitland and one Andrew Poole. Mr. Maitland still works from the offices of ResCo. Should any mining take place in this area it will be under the name of DCM.
Mr. Maitland presented a map and advised that it is the desire of DCM to create an underground mine in the Jerrys Plains area, in an arc from Jones Reserve Road just above the township, then heading in a northerly direction towards the Golden Highway, stopping just before reaching that roadway, then heading in a rough westerly direction to the Denman side of Doyles Creek. All the land that is enclosed by this line and the border of the Wollemi National Park is in the area that DCM wishes to mine. This area takes in properties on the Golden Highway leaving Jerrys Plains going towards Muswellbrook, part of Coolmore, part of Woodlands, ALL of Appletree Flat and ALL of Doyles Creek.
There is no Exploration License over this area. DCM would have to apply to the NSW Government. This area has been selected, according to Mr. Maitland after receiving advice from geologists that this coal deposit is unclaimed.
Mr. Maitland estimated that there are around 100 million tonnes of coal in this area to a depth of up to 200 metres. He stated that there was a possibility to open cut an area towards Bureen and Coolmore. After questioning, Mr. Maitland stated that if that was not acceptable to the community, it would not happen.
The proposed mine would be a 24 hour operation, employing some 100 people, with a life of 25 years. The proposed mine infrastructure, entrance, building etc, would take up an area estimated to be about 5 football fields.
The proposed mine entrance has not been considered in any great detail, however common practice would dictate that the opening will be at the point where the coal is more easily accessed. This point is roughly, off the Golden Highway on the Muswellbrook side of Jerry’s Plains.
Mr. Maitland anticipates that coal could be loaded onto a conveyor belt and hopefully transported to a washery at United Coal. It was suggested by the committee that this would be unsightly and noisy to which he agreed. It was suggested that should this go ahead, it would be better for the coal to be conveyed underground to the wash area. Mr. Maitland believed that this was a good alternative and something that would be considered. This would necessitate movement of coal across Peabody property. Mr. Maitland assured the committee that there has been no discussion with Peabody or no commercial arrangement reached with that organisation.
Mr. Maitland advised the DCM is partnering the University of Newcastle, Westpac Helicopter and a Vocational Training Academy to create a mining school in Jerry’s Plains that has the potential to train up to 150 people per year (50 to degree level and 100 in mining vocational training). He hopes that the school will bring 20 families to the village to live. In fact, Mr. Maitland stated that he was considering moving to the village. At a previous meeting, Mr. Maitland stated that if the community (i.e. Jerry’s Plains community) wanted priority in ancillary work positions within the school and mining infrastructure, it would be given strong consideration.
Further, Mr. Maitland advised that a helicopter simulator would be built at Jerry’s Plains to train helicopter pilots. This would be a static training facility with the emphasis on simulation. The question was raised whether there would be increased helicopter traffic in the area. Mr Maitland neither confirmed nor denied this.
Mr. Maitland stated that the project may be funded by Industry Super Funds, not necessarily a bank. He further stated that DCM is committed to the community, as it is essential that Jerrys Plains prospers. Part of their model was a town near a coal deposit which would support a mining school. Mr. Maitland mentioned town services, medical etc. He was not asked whether he believed that Jerry’s Plains had a medical service or DCM was going to introduce one.
Further, Mr. Maitland stated that a Trust would be established called Jerry’s Plains Community Trust where funds would be made available to the community. When pressed, Mr. Maitland talked in the millions of dollars. It was understood that monies would be available to further the community and members of the community, that is the Jerrys Plains community not the far flung ‘Hunter Valley Community’ which is often quoted.
It was suggested to Mr. Maitland that the school scenario may look like a façade merely to create a mining operation and that once the mine is established, the school could fall be the wayside. He was asked if the partners in the school have also committed to 25 years. He advised that they have not. However, he did add that a condition of granting the lease may well be that the school operates for the entirety of the mining operation.
He was asked what would happen if the venture was on-sold. Again, he reiterated that the mine lease would/could be subject to the school continuing to operate.
It was raised that underground mining would destroy the underground water that is critical for areas such as Appletree Flat and Doyles Creek. Mr. Maitland acknowledged this then said that DCM would look at this with a view of guaranteeing water supply to affected areas. How this would be achieved is not clear.
Mr. Maitland added that DCM would be happy to purchase any land affected by the mines, at market value. Although it is not required that DCM follow this path, Mr. Maitland said that they would rather do this than get into arguments with residents.
That is the conclusion of the summary. No information presented by Mr. Maitland has been verified by the committee. Please take the time to add your comments.